Axiom of Choice
Main versions of the axiom of choice
Definition. Given a set , a choice function (on ) is a function such that for all .
Axiom of choice. Every set has a choice function.
Definition. A set of representatives for a partition of a set is a set such that contains one exact element for every .
Proposition. The following statements are equivalent.
-
Every set has a choice function.
-
Every surjective function has a right-inverse.
-
Every partition has a set of representatives
-
A product of nonempty sets is nonempty.
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2) Let be surjective. Let be the map and a choice function on . Then is a right-inverse.
(2) ⇒ (3) If is a partition of , then there is a well-defined function such that , which must be surjective. Let be its right-inverse. Then is a set of representatives.
(3) ⇒ (4) Let be any family of sets. Then is a partition. If is a set of representatives, its elements are of the form where . So it is the graph of a function on such that . Thus, .
(4) ⇒ (1) Given a set , let where . By definition, for all .
Definition. A relation on is said to be total, or left-total, if for every there exists a such that .
There are weaker versions of the axiom of choice. For example, the axiom of countable choice states that every countable product of nonempty sets is nonempty. The axiom of dependent choice states for every left-total relation on a set , there exists a sequence on such that for all .
Proposition. choice ⇒ dependent choice ⇒ countable choice
Proof. Let be a choice function and a left-total relation on . Via induction, let be any element, and . Then the sequence is the one we wish (we need left-totality since is not defined for the empty set).
Let be countable with each . Let . Define the relation on such that . This is left-total since every is nonempty for all , so let be the sequence in with . It’s easily shown by induction that for each , for some so that the second coordinate of gives us a sequence such that .