π-base: Difficulty 4
Difficulty: 4
For proofs that are relatively simple. Maybe the first idea didn't work but it's doable in a half-hour.
24 Added: Mar 17, 2026 Difficulty: Let be an open cover, and a point-countable open refinement. Let be countable with . For each , let be the finite set of elements containing . Then is countable. For each , choose a such that . Then is countable. Any must have some as an open neighborhood, and since is dense, for some , which proves and is a subcover. 28 Added: Mar 17, 2026 Difficulty: It suffices to show regularity. Let be closed and . Let be a countable basis of . Define the collection and . Clearly for each . is , so is an open cover of . A closed subspace of a countably compact space is countably compact, so let be a finite subcover and
38 Added: Mar 18, 2026 Difficulty: Let . Note that cannot be empty, so let be in their intersection and define the path where
Any nbd of must contain both and , so if is any open set, is one of the following sets: , which are all open in . 50 Added: Mar 17, 2026 Difficulty: Let be a countable dense subset. For each , define , which is nonempty as it has itself. If , being ensures nbds of and of such that . Clearly , and implies , so . Therefore, the function defined as is injective, and 58 Added: Mar 23, 2026 Difficulty: Let such that is open in for every compact. We wish to show is open in . For , let where is open and is compact. As is open in , there exists some open such that . Thus, choose . Clearly it is open and . 110 Added: Mar 23, 2026 Difficulty: Let be a countable, closed and discrete set. Then we could define as . This is clearly continuous ( is discrete), and we can extend it to via the Tietze extension theorem. But then must be bounded, so has to be finite. 125 Added: Mar 24, 2026 Difficulty: Let be the topology of and the order topology of . The open rays and are all open in , and they form a subbasis for , so . Then the identity map is continuous. But is compact and is Hausdorff (LOTS spaces are ), so this is a homeomorphism and . 175 Added: Mar 25, 2026 Difficulty: If the space is locally euclidean, this means the open sets which are embeddable in some is an open cover, and being Lindelöf, we can take an countable subcover , where each has a homeomorphism . For each , consider
Because is dense in , the balls form a countable basis of , so is a countable basis of (since is homeomorphic). This gives us a countable basis of . 210 Added: Mar 13, 2026 Difficulty: Suppose a set is sequentially closed. Let and . Take a countable nbd of . If , then there is an ordinal for which for all . The set of ordinals is isomorphic to some . So we have , still with . From a converging transfinite sequence within a countable set, we can extract a -sequence that still converges to the same value, this was done in (T211). So we construct a sequence with , and so as we wished to prove. 263 Added: Mar 29, 2026 Difficulty: Let be the set of points which have a countable nbd. Then is locally countable and Lindelöf, so it is countable (T499). This must imply is empty, as otherwise it would need to have an isolated point which has no countable nbd, so and would imply is uncountable (thanks to Almanzoris, I had proved it on my own but it was far more complicated than this nice argument). 268 Added: Mar 29, 2026 Difficulty: We prove it is normal and (T257). For the latter, let be any closed set, and define . Let . For each there is an such that and therefore, . Since is closed, . This proves is . To prove normality, we use the fact that for a closed set , . For any disjoint closed sets and , define for each and for each . Define and . It’s clear and . If , then and for some and . But then is a contradiction. 274 Added: Mar 29, 2026 Difficulty: We use the axiom of choice (specifically the well-ordering principle) to denote a bijection where is some initial ordinal. If , the order topology on is discrete, so induces an order in which is discrete. If is infinite, then there is a bijection (the well-ordering of allows us to construct a bijection from to and then apply Schröder–Bernstein). The dictionary order on is discrete since the element is between and , so the bijection yields a discrete order in . 275 Added: Mar 29, 2026 Difficulty: Let be countable and dense. Let be the finite intersections of open rays of the form or for . For any , assume it is not a minimum or maximum of and suppose . The proof is similar for those cases by taking or . Then , as otherwise would be disconnected. Furthermore, there must be some in this interval, otherwise some with would imply . Similarly, let and so . Since , this is a countable basis. 279 Added: Mar 30, 2026 Difficulty: Let be the compact sets of which every compact for some , and define , which has the same property. Let be a local basis for some and is also a countable local basis. We wish to prove for some . By contradiction, assume there is no such . That means we can extract a sequence . Then and so is compact. But then for some , which contradicts . 292 Added: Mar 30, 2026 Difficulty: We first show the space is Alexandrov. Note that if is any family of open sets, and is any compact subspace, is open in and also finite. Thus, by removing duplicates, the family is finite and so is a finite intersection of open sets. Therefore, is open for every compact and so by the -space property, is open. Being Alexandrov, let be the smallest nbd of . Then it must be compact (T284), which is finite. 305 Added: Mar 31, 2026 Difficulty: must be : The constant sequence could not converge to (T226) and so there is a nbd of not containing , and vice versa. If is a path, is connected, so it can’t be a finite union of multiple closed sets, hence it is either a singleton or infinite. Take countably infinite and for each choose so that . Because is sequentially compact, for some subsequence and then by continuity of , yet isn’t eventually constant, a contradiction. Thus, is a singleton and the path is constant. 307 Added: Mar 31, 2026 Difficulty: It suffices to show finite sets have isolated points: If is any set, take a finite nbd, then the nbd of an isolated point of . Then it must be isolated in since is open is open. By induction, the isolated point of is trivial and has an isolated point by . For the set , let with nbd such that . If , then is the isolated point of . Otherwise, let with nbd . Then is the isolated point of since . 310 Added: Mar 31, 2026 Difficulty: Let be a continuous map with . Define as . If , then , so is continuous. Since is , the diagonal is closed, and is closed. 312 Added: Apr 2, 2026 Difficulty: Let such that there is some continuous with . To prove is closed, we use the -space property, and prove is closed in for each compact . is closed, so is closed, and so is . Then is compact, so it is closed. 351 Added: Apr 3, 2026 Difficulty: We wish to show that for every and nbd of , there exists a clopen set with . Define . By regularity, there some and such that . Inductively, given , there exists and with . Thus, we construct a decreasing sequence such that and for all . is open by P-space, and closed because . 388 Added: Apr 3, 2026 Difficulty: Suppose is a decreasing sequence of compact sets with . For each , we have where are open and decreasing. Thus, define . Clearly . For any , there exists some with , which means there is some with . But then for all , so just take and . So . 398 Added: Apr 3, 2026 Difficulty: We first show that if is countable and , then . Just enumerate and let be a nbd of with . Then is a nbd of (using P-space) and . This proves every countable set is closed and discrete, since for any , is countable with , so there must be a nbd of with . The space is zero-dimensional (T351). Contrapositively, if were to be a countably infinite set, being discrete, let be a nbd of with , then choose where is clopen. Being a P-space, note that is also clopen with , and are pairwise-disjoint. is also clopen. Then is a partition of clopen sets of and we can define for . This function must be continuous, so the space is not pseudocompact. 408 Added: Apr 3, 2026 Difficulty: Let be the current topology of and a metrizable topology on with metric . If , then for all . So define
Then is continuous with and . Since , is also continuous. 412 Added: Mar 27, 2026 Difficulty: Consider with such a separable metrizable topology. Let be a countable dense subset. To prove the result, we wish to find a function which is injective, so that . Such a function is where each is defined as . As is dense, for all and all . For , let so that , and so . 425 Added: Apr 4, 2026 Difficulty: Suppose is a sequence with and . with the order topology is a compact space. Define as , , . Then and are continuous. By -Hausdorff, the set is closed. Clearly by definition , yet is not closed, since . So and . 426 Added: Apr 4, 2026 Difficulty: Let be the dispersion point. Clearly if are points in then there is no path from to (disconnected implies path disconnected). So the only possible non-constant paths are from to . Let with and . Being , we see that is closed, so let and then . But for any , the path lies within so it must be constant, proving for all , and so is discontinuous at : Take a nbd of not containing , yet every open interval containing must contain some . 442 Added: Apr 4, 2026 Difficulty: Similar proof to (T427). Let be an increasing sequence of compact sets which cover . Let be an open cover. For each , there exists a finite subset such that covers . Then define and . Clearly by construction, must be an open refinement of . And for each , let be the smallest index so that . This immediately implies for any with , and so intersects at most the nbds in , which is finite. 445 Added: Apr 5, 2026 Difficulty: Firstly, note that a compact LOTS space must have minimum and maximum elements. If it didn’t have a maximum, the open intervals would be an open cover with no finite subcover. Similarly for the minimum. So let be the minimum and the maximum elements. We first see that is open. Given , if there is some , then take and . If there is no such , let and . In both cases, we have , , and every element of is strictly greater than every element of . Let . Then and so . Through a similar proof, is open as well. Note that , , and . Because is connected, this means , and so there must be some , so . 567 Added: Mar 13, 2026 Difficulty: is a countable union of finite open sets. hereditarily connected, so this basis is linearly ordered and it’s possible to enumerate them as where . Therefore, and is a union of finite sets. 702 Added: Mar 21, 2026 Difficulty: If not discrete, there exists a non-isolated point . Let be its injectively path connected nbd, which must contain some . Let be an injective path from to . Then and are connected and disjoint.(Meta-Lindelöf ∧ Separable) Lindelöf
( ∧ Countably compact ∧ First countable)
Ultraconnected Path connected
( ∧ Separable) Cardinality
Weakly locally compact -space
(Normal ∧ Pseudocompact) Weakly countably compact
(GO-space ∧ Compact) LOTS
(Locally Euclidean ∧ Lindelöf) Second countable
(Locally countable ∧ Pseudoradial) Sequential
(Hereditarily Lindelöf ∧ Scattered) Countable
Pseudometrizable Perfectly normal
Discrete LOTS
(LOTS ∧ Connected ∧ Separable) Second countable
(Hemicompact ∧ First countable) Weakly locally compact
(Anticompact ∧ -space) Locally finite
Sequentially discrete Totally path disconnected
(Locally finite ∧ ) Scattered
Has closed retracts
(-space ∧ KC) Has closed retracts
(Regular ∧ P-space) Zero dimensional
space Countably metacompact
(P-space ∧ ∧ Pseudocompact) Finite
Submetrizable Functionally Hausdorff
Has a coarser separable metrizable topology Cardinality
-Hausdorff US
( ∧ Has a dispersion point) Totally path disconnected
(-compact ∧ KC) Metacompact
(Compact ∧ Connected ∧ LOTS ∧ ¬ Empty) Fixed point property
(Hereditarily connected ∧ Locally finite) Countable
(Locally injectively path connected ∧ ¬ Discrete) ¬ Biconnected