Compactness
Equivalent and non-equivalent notions of compactness, and their proofs.
Definition. A topological space is compact (C) if every open cover has a finite subcover. It is Lindelöf (L) if every open cover has a countable subcover. It is countably compact (CC) if every countable open cover has a finite subcover.
Proposition 1. C (CC and L)
Proof. Evident.
Definition. A topological space is FIP if every family of closed sets with the finite intersection property has a nonempty intersection.
Proposition 2. C FIP
Proof. Any family of closed sets is dual to by . is a cover iff and has a finite subcover iff does not have the finite intersection property.
Definition. is CM if for any , the projection is a closed map.
Proposition 3. C CM
Proof. () Let closed and . Then contains the tube . By the tube lemma, there is some neighborhood of such that , and . So is open. () If not compact, take a countable cover with no finite subcover. Let . Let so that is a countable basis for 0 and , is open. Choose . Clearly yet any neighborhood of 0 contains . If , then would be a cover of , so .
Definition. A directed set is any set with a preorder (partial order without antisymmetry) such that any finite set has an upper bound (in particular, for , there is some with and ). A net is any family indexed by a directed set. A subnet is a net defined by which is order-preserving and cofinal (for any , there’s a with ). A net is eventually in if for some , any upper bound of is in . A net converges to a point , and we write if it is eventually in for every neighborhood of . We call the limit of the net. A net is cofinally in if for all , there’s a with and . A point is said to be a cluster point if the net is cofinally in for all neighborhoods of .
Proposition 4. C Every net has a cluster point Every net has a converging subnet C (uses A.C.)
Proof. (1st ) Suppose has no cluster point. Let . Since no is a cluster point, . Then is an open cover. Take finite subcover. For each , there is some for which . Take any upper bound of .
(2nd ) Let be cluster point of and a basis for . Then is a directed set if we define . Let be the projection to . It is order-preserving by definition and cofinal since is cluster. Finally, it it follows that .
(3rd ) Let be an open cover. Define , this is a directed set. Contrapositively, if it has no finite subcover, take a choice function where . The net cannot have a cluster point: If is a neighborhood of , for any .
Definition. A point is said to be a cluster point of a sequence if for any given nbd of , there are infinitely many of which .
Note that every sequence is itself, a net, as the natural numbers are a directed set. The cluster point notion of nets is the same as above when applied to sequences. Similarly, a subsequence is defined by a function which is strictly increasing (as a consequence of being order-preserving and cofinal). A sequence converging to a point is the same notion to convergence of nets when applied to sequences. In a way, sequences are a special case of nets, which has a lot more structure but is also a lot more restricting. In general compact sets, they bring non-equivalent notions.
Lemma 1. If a sequence has a converging subsequence, then it has a cluster point.
Proof. Let . For any nbd of , there exists such that for , and there are infinitely many such . So is a cluster point.
Proposition 5. CC Every sequence has a cluster point.
Proof. () Suppose some sequence has no cluster point. So every has a nbd such that is finite. Let denote all open sets such that . If , then is a countable cover of . It can’t have a finite cover, since . () Suppose some countable cover has no finite subcover. Then choose and . No could be a cluster point of , since for some and for any .
Definition. Given , its sequential closure is the set of all of which there exists some sequence in such that . A set is sequentially closed if .
Lemma 2. for any set . Every closed set is sequentially closed.
Proof. If with , then by definition, for any nbd of there is an such that for . So and therefore, . The second fact follows from the fact that a set is closed if and only if .
Definition. A space is sequential (Seq) if every sequentially closed is closed. A space is sequentially compact (SC) if every sequence has a converging subsequence.
Proposition 6. SC CC
Proof. Immediate from Lemma 1 and Proposition 5.
This proves being countably compact is weaker than being compact or sequentially compact. However, both of the latter are incompatible, in the sense that there are topological spaces which are compact and not sequentially compact (using the axiom of choice, consider the product topology on ), and sequentially compact spaces which are not compact (The order topology on , the first uncountable ordinal). Conversely, there’s something beautiful about being able to say that a space is sequentially compact if it is sequential and compact. This is true, but the condition is not necessary, we only require countable compactness.
Proposition 7. (CC and Seq) SC
Proof. See Theorem 223 here.